top of page

Medical Cannabis and the Persistence of Federal Prohibition

Alina Zheng
02/09/2026

In recent years, an increasing number of states in the United States have legalized the use of cannabis for medical purposes, reflecting a significant shift in both public opinion and state-level policy. Despite this, the federal government has continued to classify cannabis as a Schedule I controlled substance, a designation that implies no accepted medical use and a high potential for abuse. However, the persistence of federal cannabis prohibition cannot be explained by scientific uncertainty alone. Rather, it reflects how historical narratives rooted in racial propaganda and fearmongering became embedded in legal and bureaucratic institutions that change far more slowly than public opinion or medical evidence. Together, the legal frameworks governing cannabis classification, the cultural narratives underlying its criminalization, the expanding body of medical research, and the institutional barriers to reform reveal a widening divide between federal policy and contemporary evidence. This divide demonstrates how institutional structures can preserve an outdated classification long after its original justifications have eroded.

 

Wilmington, Delaware, 19801

ISSN: 3070-3875

DOI: 10.65161

 

The Oxford Journal of Student Scholarship (ISSN: 3070-3875) is an independent publication and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or connected to the University of Oxford or any of its colleges, departments, or programs.

 

© 2025 by the Oxford Journal of Student Scholarship 

 

bottom of page